Ah, but when women outnumber men, by far (and its the same here in the UK, with respect to the public sector), thats okay because its VERY diverse. >> CEOs will tune into the Canadians ideas and want to know why HR is wasting all this money. Why dont you accurately relay his ideas to your readers rather than making him out to be a monster. Eradicating the pay gap could work against womens true interests, he says, by interfering with their preferred choices, such as less demanding careers. If I did not have children, I would be at my office from 8 a.m.-5 p.m. every day, thus mirroring John's life. Jordan Peterson debate on the gender pay gap, campus protests and postmodernism. Maybe he was just ignoring rubbish based pseudo-science. It points to how gender imbalances at work actually start much earlier, in education. And there are going to be differences in economic outcome associated with this variance. Lets assume (which I dont) that there is patriarchy, and with it, generally undeserved privilege. Jordan Peterson's view on the gender pay gap is that it's real and it's the consequence of many different variables. Your involuntary unconscious perceptions have to be retrained., Again, he is careful to ground his scathing criticism in some kind of evidence:People are categorised by novelty aversion. According to Peterson, the population of agreeable people is dominated by women resulting in a fraction of the "gender" pay gap. Thus, selection for competence should optimally be sex-blind, if competence is the most important factor. HR is in a tough spot with the mobs of social justice ideologs tearing companies apart damore was a witch hunt. Over the last few weeks, I have been in Oslo, twice; Helsinki, twice; Stockholm, twice; and Copenhagen, once. Those are ineradicable differences if you leave men and women to make their own choices you will not get equal outcomes.. Original reporting and incisive analysis, direct from the Guardian every morning, Three gender pay gap myths debunked video explainer. Damore was fired in August last year and has subsequently accused the company of discriminating against white conservative men in a class action claim. https://goo.gl/SQP1si, Thank you. Not my business: how workplace racism goes unchallenged. Peterson did not say that "the market is 80% controlled by women." content language. In fact, if theres one thing in the controversial intelligence debate we can rule out, its that the genes that give rise to skin color do not give rise to intelligence. Practitioners, he adds, need to be aware of the risk that CEOs will tune into the Canadians ideas and want to know why HR is wasting all this money. That is simply not a reasonable solution. Two arguments that Jordan puts on the table to explain the gender pay gap are as follows: Women are more attracted to jobs that generally pay less than jobs that attract men (teachers vs engineers). Though the two have never sparred in person, they havent be shy about offering an opinion on each others work. Harish Bhayani, senior partner at PRM Diversity Consultants, thinks so, but concedes bias testing and training is ineffective if not continuous. Wrong. Heres another, showing that at least some of the much-vaunted gender gap in pay, which is caused by many factors, can be attributed to male/female personality differences and not to simple discrimination. A theme of the article was fairness and being able to identify the best candidates. Kandola says that Peterson has misrepresented IAT, which has proved useful, particularly in racial stereotyping. more inclusive organisations where leaders know they are doing everything they can to recruit the best What if recruiting the best results in bringing in ever more white males, as it often does?. Again, there is an element of truth here. Im surprised by your comment. The fairly influential paper that established this was by Claudia Goldin and her cleverly titled paper:Orchestrating Impartiality: The Impact of Blind Auditions on Female Musicians. https://goo.gl/D7m2a6 According to Rob Briner, professor of organisational psychology at Queen Mary University of London, Peterson makes several points that HR leaders should heed. Well attempt to unpack his arguments about the gender pay gap, and the literature surrounding the gender pay gap all while attempting to keep a certain level of objectivity. The opposite is not true, and has never proven to be true, and is largely unsupportable. "If you're a social scientist worth your salt, you never do a univariate analysis. | jordan peterson t.co 3ydqbsuaeh". https://lnkd.in/dShtnhj it's not exactly a debate but absolutely worth watching #debateskills Toronto University professor Jordan Peterson, who rose to international fame due to his opposition to mandatory gender-neutral pronouns, as well as criticism of feminism and socialism, has often referenced "feminist" Scandinavian countries as having the highest gender differences in the world, despite their commitment to equality. Dr Peterson empathises hierarchies of competence over hierarchies of power. Those are in ineradicable differences. I pointed out it wasnt particularly diverse. He adds that the abilities and choices of men and women differed in part because of biology and this was why we dont see equal representation of women in tech and leadership. But they are importantly different. Peterson may have reservations about one method the IAT but that doesnt mean bias doesnt exist. Absolutely, and Peterson says as much himself, that there are more in group differences than there are differences between groups. We should agree with him women and men are different but so are men and men and so are women and so are chimps and chimps The method? These arguments, in conjunction with the line about multi-variate analyses have shown the pay gap doesnt exist, are seemingly contradictory, at least on the surface. The possibility of identifying a competent person increases as the pool of available candidates increases. forms: { Over the last few weeks, I have been in Oslo, twice; Helsinki, twice; Stockholm, twice; and Copenhagen, once. Gender equality has been a hot topic in recent years, with many people advocating for equal pay and opportunities for women in the workplace. I chose to have a 15 year career break, and consider I was fortunate to be in a position to do so. The job of the Federal government is important, necessary and difficult. Adam McCulloch is a freelance writer and production editor who has worked in sectors including travel (The Guardian), aviation (Flight International), agriculture (Farmers' Weekly), music (Jazzwise), theatre (The Stage) and social work (Community Care). Petersons philosophical positions informed by thinkers such as Jung, Dostoyevsky and Nietzsche have led him to question many contemporary HR policies. Last year, Petersons criticisms were thrown into sharp relief by the debate over Google software engineer James Damore, who had attacked the internet giants flawed diversity agenda. In other words, is there a cost to the business of opening up the qualifications to being on an engineering team? As most people know (unless they've been living under a rock), Peterson is the clinical psychologist and author of the wildly successful book, 12 Rules for Life, who in January took on Cathy Newman of U.K.'s Channel 4 in a debate about the pay gap. Engineers, for example, tend to be those who are not only interested in things, but who are more interested in things than most people, men or women. I think he is describing health care. Hi Fausto, author here. In. })(); at the site of my interview with James Damore, Something approaching a consensus among psychologists expert in measurement, produce comparatively fewer women in the STEM fields, can be attributed to male/female personality differences. During the YouTube discussion Damore alleges that Google held meetings to pressure people to increase the diversity of their team. To make important, difficult decisions properly, competence is necessary. The full memo was about encouraging women in stem not excluding them. Let HR abolish all pornography before they virtue signal. PART 1: SCANDINAVIA. At other times youll work on a project alone and then discuss what youve designed with colleagues. Scandinavians appear particularly interested in what I am saying. Zunger adds: Engineering is all about cooperation, collaboration and empathy for colleagues and customers. Engineering is all about cooperation, collaboration and empathy for colleagues and customers. Danielle Brown, Googles vice president of diversity, rejects Damores incorrect assumptions about gender andconfidently asserts Googles commitment to its employee policies: Diversity and inclusion are a fundamental part of our values and the culture we continue to cultivate. It seems to me that these clear differences are not really that clear when you look closely at the evidence. Thats a consequence of the free choice of men and women in the societies that have gone farther than any other societies to make gender equality the purpose of the law. This is the largest psychological difference between men and women yet identified. Now hes making both a statistical and conceptual point that might sound circular but its fundamental to understanding most social science claims. Jordan Bernt Peterson (born 12 June 1962) is a Canadian psychologist, . So, this is the Scandinavian conundrumone that also affects broader Western society (and the remainder of the world, soon enough). Dianah Worman, co-director of Inclusive Talent and an adviser to the CIPD, says: The concept of success is changing. We should just treat individuals as individuals all different and all with strengths, weaknesses, foibles and idiosyncrasies. You can eradicate them with tremendous social pressure and tyranny. And low female wages were not simply an expression of this worldview, they also helped to create it, Griffin wrote. Photograph: Channel 4. About Press Copyright Contact us Creators Advertise Developers Terms Privacy Policy & Safety How YouTube works Test new features NFL Sunday Ticket Press Copyright . It doesnt really matter though because no one is keeping women out of any fields they want to be in. This is a view shared by a small but vocal coalition of rightwing think tanks, Jordan Peterson, and mens rights activists. Employee Benefits The only thing that needs more emphasis by Peterson and others is the destructive power of three generations of pornography. Its fair to point out the flaws in the statistics. (function() { That is not the case for men. Essentially he is saying that if you took the average amount made by men and compared it to women, there would be a difference. And there is a major but. The gender pay gap does not exist because men and women are paid less for the same jobs, it exists because men and women tend to do slightly different jobs. (Not just Peterson, this has been observed by others as well, not least of all by an ex diversity hire by Apple. Reality: Canada's Human Rights Act does prohibit gender discrimination in pay. The tide is turning. But the theory that women have less aptitude for science subjects has been repeatedly debunked. ", When the interviewer asked him why jobs that involve working with people can't be measured alongside jobs that involve working with things, Peterson correctly noted that work which is relationship-oriented nursing, teaching, child care, elder care isn't "scalable.". To begin with, the statistic alone is misleading. Manchester United star Cristiano Ronaldo posted an image along outspoken and controversial Canadian author Jordan Peterson on his Instagram account over the weekend. The correct figure is 1,600. In a blog post for the Adam Smith Institute, Ben Southwood writes: Women leave the labour market during crucial years, setting them substantially back in labour market terms. You failed to mention that the author quoted Peterson and sent it to these experts who had time to formulate a rebuttal without allowing Peterson to defend his position. If you repeat often enough that everything must be looked at through skin colour and genitalia, dont be surprised when people take you at your word. Cathy Newman interviews Jordan Peterson. He says:The HR equity people are mucking about with peoples unconscious bias. Women do choose to have children, and many will reduce their hours when they do. Increasing globalisation means more co-operation.. The RAD Awards He arguesthat Peterson offers a springboard for helping professionals question and justify their policies: Many might think hes being horrible and unfair, but perhaps hes just spotted a chink in HRs armour. I dont think its about disproving claims but more about presenting how many different factors there are in all this. They only respond in vague generalities. The most extreme myth is that gender pay gap is a lie perpetuated by feminists who use statistics dishonestly to further their cause. The interviewer seemed eager to impute to Peterson a belief that a large, extant wage gap between men and women is a "fact of life" that women should just "put up with," though all those. Two reasons. callback: cb She is an author, Fox News contributor, and trustee of Leading Women for Shared Parenting. Men and women are not the same and wont be the same, but that doesnt mean women shouldnt be treated fairly., There are other reasons why equality is unattainable, Peterson explains: Many women around the age of between 28 and 32, have a career-family crisis that they have to deal with. They decide to take time out to have and raise children perhaps moving to more flexible work or less demanding jobs.. Engineering is mostly about problem solving and logical thinking. So this interview seems to have exploded in popularity in the last couple of days,even spawning memes about the way Cathy Newman handled the conversation, so i decided to post here to see what you guys think about it. The conservative commentator has changed his tone recently about the de-criminilzation of Marijuana. He discusses the pay gap, patriarchy and his new book " 12 Rules for Life ." Subscribe: http://bit.ly/2mFYm8e. Many might think hes being horrible and unfair, but perhaps hes just spotted a chink in HRs armour Rob Briner. Allegations and resignations shine unwelcome light on RAF Transport sector recruitment should be overhauled to improve Im not an activist: I just want fairer Driving performance and capability through L&D. For 50,000 years men and women have behaved in a way that enabled us to thrive, not just survive- cooperating, dividing tasks, and living in tribes. -> She adds that Peterson was selective with the facts Even when men and women are most different in those cultures where they differ most, and along those trait dimensions where they differ most they are more similar than different. If women do not try to negotiate for better pay aggressively, and are therefore not getting the pay they deserve then a gender pay gap exists. This allowed for many socioligical variables to be kept consistent. Where is the high profile CIPD campaign to encourage more men into HR ? My employer need only be concerned with how much of that I bring to work. See below for a distribution chart. He says:The best solutions recognise that it is not a one-off fix but a constant battle against our unconscious brains ongoing tendencies to stereotype. The article is an exploration of various arguments and opinions. Ben Shapiro On Israel PalestineThough theres a long history here, its Ben Shapiro On Socialism Even more than his views on abortion, Ben Shapiro is Scholar Fact Check Help Fix Fake News. The real pay gap is between mothers and fathers, not between women and men. Where are the largest differences? Jordan Peterson defends ancient truths with science and fact. . With a vast online audience for his views, the sector needs to respond with hard facts and strong arguments, writes Adam McCulloch. Its not just the hard cash costs of diversity officers and these programs nor the losses theyll face when they lose in court its the insane distraction of counting colored faces and skirts vs pants that is a terrible waste of energy that moves nothing forward at all. https://goo.gl/HeHWqs Seems there is an extreme reluctance to face some brute facts about the clear differences between men and women and their preferences when making work/life decisions. Describe people every which way imaginable, and then use large samples and powerful statistics to sort out the resulting mess. https://www.scribd.com/document/355823379/Google-s-Ideological-Echo-Chamber. Are they betraying their true nature? There is no relationship between sex and competence. Privacy policy Its not the average more aggressive/less agreeable male thats in prison. Channel 4 News' full, fiery interview with clinical psychologist and professor Jordan B Peterson, whose views on gender have amassed great controversy - and a huge online following. Her fifth book, The Alpha Females Guide to Men & Marriage: HOW LOVE WORKS, was published in February 2017. CONTROVERSIAL clinical psychologist Jordan Peterson claimed the gender pay gap is "unsolvable" and "deadly" in a 60 Minutes interview. The researchers found that the number of people just showing up to the audition skyrocketed when switching to blind auditions. He's tough, calm, smart, and, most importantly, he's right. In an interview at the time, Peterson mentioned "a great paper" showing that "as societies become more egalitarian, the enrollment gap between men and women in STEM fields increases." He added, "And what do the feminists say about that? This paper examines the negative consequences of neoliberal self-care discourses related to COVID-19 that contributed to the disinfodemic, focusing on the wellness industry. In the last 50 years we are being asked to override that. Only 23% of the UKs science, technology, engineering and maths (STEM) workforce is female. Are the differences bigger in some countries and smaller in others? However, thats not exactly what he said and, as he never tires of telling us, hes, Now hes making both a statistical and conceptual point that might sound circular but its fundamental to understanding most social science claims. OHW+ In an interview with Channel 4's Cathy Newman, Jordan Peterson said these. https://goo.gl/GdFFoa Not to comment on any of the rest of the article, bu the first two paragraphs under hostile workplace are ridiculous. I wonder who did? These arguments, in conjunction with the line about multi-variate analyses have shown the pay gap doesnt exist, are seemingly contradictory, at least on the surface. Forum for Expatriate Management . A whole bunch of equity industry participants complain that hes too persuasive, throw out stuff like unfairness if ok if it leads to the outcomes we want, and tell companies they need to double-down on their efforts to beat Social Equity opinions into their confused staff. In 2018, he attracted attention in the UK after a Channel 4 News interview with Cathy Newman on the gender pay gap, in which he disputed the idea that the pay gap is solely due to sexual discrimination. Im allowed to be a racist, sexist, misogynist, homophobe, etc. Those differences are a good thing. Jordan Peterson debates the gender pay gap with BBC Channel 4 News' Cathy Newman. And while training can improve scores on the IAT, again the improved scores have shown zero correlation with behavior. The only facts in this article are contained in the quotes attributed to Dr. Peterson. Peterson would be a better model for HR- take responsibility, tell the truth and say no to Marxism. He. Its a one way ticket to a more fractured society. If his conclusion drawn from research are erroneous, articulate why? However that does not mean we need unnecessarily vilify him. That is not what the 80% figure shows. Contact us Sign up now to get the Washington Examiners breaking news and timely commentary delivered right to your inbox. select article A nationwide cohort investigation on pay-for-performance and major adverse limb events in patients with diabetes. TRANSCRIPT (29 mins) [00:02] Dr. Jordan Peterson 2019-02-26T12:03:23-05:00 I came across Dr. Warren Farrell's work a few years ago, when I read Why Men Earn More( https://amzn.to/2HX3Epj ), a careful study of the many reasons for the existence of the "gender pay gap," attributed by ideologues of the identity-politics persuasion to systemic patriarchal prejudice and . Email newsletters } Virginia Republicans give Trump an edge, but only DeSantis and Youngkin lead Biden, The ESG attack on energy becomes personal, The Debrief: Conn Carroll on HHS encouraging illegal child labor, WATCH: Steven Spielberg likens rise in antisemitism to 'Germany in the '30s', AOC gloats after construction of Virginia Amazon headquarters delayed as company cuts jobs, Alex Murdaugh trial: Watch the key video that could've sealed guilty murder verdict. Some days I'm not in my office at all; some days I come in at 9 or 10 a.m. and then leave at 2 p.m.; and still other days I might not arrive until close to lunchtime. window.mc4wp.listeners.push( Peterson ascribes this gender imbalance to innate differences between men and women. To close their pay gaps, companies should ensure women are on shortlists for senior roles, be transparent about pay and promotions, and encourage men to take shared parental leave, according to government guidance. John, author here. Lets be clear: are we doing this for business or for moral reasons?. Women who have decided for a better work/life balance should realise that the payoff is just that; a better work/life balance, which is more valuable that the small financial price that is paid. Stella Creasy discusses the gender pay gap on Sky News. That's the standard tactic of the left, especially when it comes to gender issues. Channel 4 News' full, fiery interview with clinical psychologist and professorJordan B Peterson, whose views on gender have amassed great controversy - and a huge online following. It distracts from the real challenges of building more inclusive organisations where leaders know they are doing everything they can to recruit the best, rather than inadvertently cloning themselves., James Damore and his lawyer Harmeet Dhillon at a press conference discussing his lawsuit against Google (see panel)Picture: Michael Liedtke/AP/REX/Shutterstock, She says Petersons fears about employees being labelled biased are groundless, stating how during work with clients over a long period of time nobody was called racist or sexist, and nor should they have been. Jordan Peterson debate on the gender pay gap, campus protests and postmodernism Hey everyone! Men and women wont sort themselves into the same categories if you leave them to do it of their own accord, he said. Gender pay gap remains largely unchanged, study finds. Still not convinced, the program went so far as to suggest that those oppose such legislation (clearly referring to Peterson) are "threatened " by it. Some health gurus and wellness instructors promoted lifestyle adjustments and self-care to prevent contracting the virus . Using an unfair solution to create equality will cause more division. This article provided no such evidence (even some kind of evidence), just comments from people that get paid to assume the contrary conclusion to Peterson. Article 106849 . Its very important to remember that many choices are made at the extreme, and not the average. Policies that maximize equality of opportunity make equality of outcome increasingly impossible. cooperation and collaboration are of course essential, but not so much once a jab has been parceled out to the various individual contributors. Social work and nursing are all about those. And why should we presume that we know how in any manner to eliminate gender identity among young children? So when you remove the biggest drivers of #GenderPayGap (children/part time work) the earnings gap all but vanishes (and in some studies lesbians earn 42% more than straight women). They say he has failed to take account of the historical changes in gender roles or business and employees desire for fairness through equality of opportunity. Alex Stein took to the street to try and solve the most important problem of our time: the OnlyFans gender pay gap. In an interview with Channel 4s Cathy Newman, Jordan Peterson said these innate differences explained why the majority of nurses are women and the majority of engineers are men. World of Learning Summit opens its doors in London Olympia this February! Only 26% of the elected MPs in Trudeaus government were women. She had listened recently to an interview of Jordan Peterson, the psychology professor from University of Toronto, who she said casts doubt on gender discrimination as the basis for the. See https://www.chronicle.com/article/Can-We-Really-Measure-Implicit/238807 He would suggest that the IAT, the election of Trump, and the not only the differences in employment choices in Scandinavia, but also the relatively small number of women looking to take leadership positions in politics in those countries, are the result of what happens when the playing field is leveled through societal constructs. So the gender pay gap is a myth. Whatmedia, Advertising opportunities But if you leave men and women to make their own choices you will not get equal outcome.. However, the differences that do exist are large enough so that they play an importance role in determining or at least affecting important life outcomes, such as occupational choice. Is it also unreasonable to point out that the women who accepted those positions, granted to them unfairly, in a prejudiced and discriminatory manner, took that as their due, despite the unlikelihood, statistically, of their suitability for the positions in question, and thus betrayed themselves, men and women everywhere striving fairly for advancement and authority, and their country? I was interviewed by the Diversity Officer (woman) who asked how I would work in what had been an all women team of 10. And that is assuming that the scientist allows for thorough and rigorous disagreement, which helps solidify the conclusions of the science. Thank you for this porn is something I am very concerned about too and it seems to be the elephant in the room (not wishing to insult elephants), its negative effects are too often just ignored or brushed under the carpet. By analogy, lets say that if you summed the average I.Q. Google seems to be forcing personnel into pipelines without regard for the essential nature of work in those pipelines. With a vast online audience for his views, the sector needs to respond with hard facts and strong arguments, writes Adam McCulloch. Heres a full list of the cabinet members, in case you want to contact them and let them know what you think. https://gynocentrism.com/2018/03/03/jordan-peterson-on-psychological-differences-similarities-between-the-sexes/. Peterson often misses the historical context, says Kandola, ignoring the fact that men and women have taken on very different roles in different eras men dominating nursing roles until Florence Nightingale helped to create a profession that was soon considered womens work. This would seem to refute his line that the multi-variate analyses have been clear in showing that the gender pay gap does not exist. By selecting 50% of his cabinet from 26% of the pool of available candidates, Prime Minister Trudeau abdicated his responsibility to rank-order all of his elected officials by competence (which could have been done by blind, multi-person rating of their resumes, including education and accomplishments) and staffing his cabinet from the most qualified person downward. That's what I thought about when I watched a bogus segment on the Australian version of "60 Minutes" about the gender pay gap over the weekend. If you minimize the cultural differences (as you do with egalitarian social policies) then you allow the biological differences to manifest themselves fully. The IAT can reasonably demonstrate some level of difficult to measure implicit bias. https://goo.gl/smtUHY It is very much *not* about people. Saw half my companys HR staff sacked after a consultancy reviewed their policies and procedures. In fact, the subject of children and of sex differences was never broached on their part, not even once. You have a better chance without the IAT, because its probably junk. Western Culture is wasting a fortune to prove these PC ideas are as insane and unnecessary as they sound and meanwhile falling behind on the actual focus of the business at hand.